Monday, March 30, 2009

Jose Wouldn’t Turn Down United

Title: Jose Wouldn’t Turn Down United

Former Chelsea manager and media favourite Jose Mourinho claimed that if Sir Alex Ferguson stepped down as Manchester United manager, he wouldn’t be able to refuse an offer should he be approached by the United board. The Inter Milan manager saw his side knocked out of the Champions League by Sir Alex last month and in an interview at Old Trafford prior the second leg, Jose replied “It feels like home…” when asked how he felt upon returning to the Theatre Of Dreams, where his Chelsea side never beat United during his reign.

Mourinho has never hidden his admiration for the English game, and is widely expected to be back in the Premier League in the coming seasons, but questions remain to as who would be the club signing the man who led Porto to a Champions League honour, and Chelsea to several honours including two back to back titles. Not too long ago, he went on record stating his belief that Cristiano Ronado, tipped with a move to Real Madrid, should stay at Manchester United because it was the right club for him. Speaking to American Sporting media, ESPN, Jose had this to say on a possible move along with realising Ferguson may stay for a few more seasons,

Which is the manager that says no? Nobody can say no! Manchester United belongs to a small group of clubs from around the world where nobody can say no. I don’t believe in 2010 he (Alex Ferguson) is leaving. I don’t believe. I think year after year he is the same, he’s exactly the same person; healthy, happy, so I don’t see a reason for him to quit and in a very fair way, I hope he still goes, I hope he still goes on, because he’s good.

It is a statement which makes one wonder how much of Jose wants to manage United? Did the interest arise on that night when he went dancing down the Old Trafford touchline? Did it start when United broke Chelsea’s dominance and won the Premier League crown stopping a possible 3 in a row? Either way, the tactical genius has Manchester on his radar and when you look at a possible shortlist for managers taking over from Sir Alex, Jose is surely on the list and the list won’t be too long I myself would think.



Written By: Keano!

Visit Premier League Chat

© PremierLeagueChat.com

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Ferguson: Hey Big Spender!

Title: Ferguson: Hey Big Spender!

Man Utd boss Sir Alex Ferguson has reignited the flames in his feud with Rafa Benitez of Liverpool. Ferguson hinted at his expectation for Benitez to embark on a spending spree in the summer, after the conclusion of a series of protracted contract negotiations led to Benitez signing on the dotted line, committing himself to the Reds until 2014. The Man Utd boss continued by disputing Benitez's earlier claims that the Red Devils have outspent Liverpool by £100m. He clearly took an exception to Benitez's claims as he immediately ordered Man Utd staff to check up on the figures. Ferguson then revealed that it was in fact his Liverpool counterpart who has been spending more, and by United's calculations Benitez has spent £24m more.


He said United's own figures showed Liverpool had spent £24m more in overall terms.

"He's well ahead of us in spending in the l
ast five years," Ferguson claimed.

-BBC
Sport


The PLC's hatchet man turan provides a damning indictment on why Man Utd manager Sir Alex Ferguson may well be suffering from a severe case of delusion. When I first came across Ferguson's remarks, my immediate reaction was something along the lines of "Jeez! Is this guy for real?" I could not believe that Ferguson can even have the cheek let alone the nerve to suggest that Liverpool and indeed Benitez have outspent him. I refer to my case as follows. The signing of Fernando Torres has been Liverpool's one and only £20m+ purchase. It is also quite telling that Liverpool have not managed to break the British record transfer fee in recent years. On the other hand, as for Man Utd, I can name a whole host of players bought for £20m+ - Berbatov £30.75m, Rooney £27m, Ferdinand £30m [British record transfer fee at the time], Veron £28.1m [British record transfer fee at the time]... and even then a host of others have come pretty close to the £20m mark - Van Nistelrooy £19m [British record transfer fee at the time], Carrick £18.6m, Hargreaves £17m, Anderson + Nani £30m, Tosic + Ljajic £16.3m [This transfer came just days after Mr "I do not think there will be any January transfers, I am happy with what I have got" made his remarks...] This is not to mention a host of other [albeit less expensive] flops - Saha £12.8m, Kleberson £6m, Djemba-Djemba £3.5m, David Bellion £3m, Quinton Fortune £1.5m... The only signing that represents even a hint of Ferguson's financial prudence was that of Cristiano Ronaldo £12.25m, whose value has since rocketed. The apparent lack of financial constraints is also evident during Ferguson's reign at Man Utd, something which is not mirrored by his Liverpool counterpart. Benitez enjoyed a brief spell of increased transfer spending shortly after the arrival of American duo Tom Hicks and George Gillett as new owners of the club, and it was during this honeymoon period that £20m+ Torres was purchased by Benitez. Since then, the new owners have tightened the purse strings and as a consequence Benitez has consistently had to generate transfer funds from player sales, something that is apparently unfamiliar to Ferguson. Some Man Utd fans have slagged off Benitez for buying into quantity rather than quality. This is a flawed criticism. If Benitez had the financial resources to blow £30m on a single player, I am sure he would have done so by now. The "quantity over quality" argument put forward by United fans can be observed by a more refreshing approach. Imagine that both managers have been given £100,000 each to spend on a brand new car of their
choice, using the United fans' argument Ferguson would use the money to buy a top of the range Porsche whilst Benitez would use it to buy twenty Nissan Micras. From this metaphorical representation, you can immediately see how absurd the "quantity over quality" argument sounds. In reality, however, Ferdinand's transfer fee alone would dwarf the cost of the entire Liverpool's defence, and the contrast is even more stark between Liverpool and Man Utd's attack. As for Ferguson's expectation for Rafa to spend big this summer, I say don't kid yourself Fergie, I would hardly call Benitez's reported £30m summer transfer kitty big judging by your standards.

What Ferguson has said is nothing short of ridiculous, it's almost as similar as Spurs saying to Arsenal,"You've spent more than us and that's why you have won all the cups." Some Man Utd fans honestly believe that Benitez cannot recognise the difference betwe
en a £20m Keane and a £30m Berbatov, nor can he distinguish the gulf between a Lennon and a Messi/Ronaldo.... Do you seriously believe Benitez can be so inept that he would intentionally go for a mediocre player if he had the funds for a world class player? If you do, then more fool you.

NB - January transfer




















Liverpool

Amount spent: £0

Estimated amount received: Keane £12m (rising with add-ons)

Manchester United

Estimated amount spent: Zoran Tosic and Adem Ljajic £17.3m

Amount received: £0

When Benitez hinted he was unlikely to do any major transfer deals in January, he was being truly sincere and actually meant what he said. Ferguson should take note... I personally wouldn't be surprised if Sir Alex does manage to find the £32m from somewhere to secure Tevez on a permanent deal, since finding vast sums of money to spend is obviously a hobby of his. This thought must have eluded Ferguson when he made those remarks disputing Benitez's claims. Perhaps the Liverpool boss should continue to goad him until he eventually wakes from his case of severe delusion and smell the coffee.





Written By: turan

Visit Premier League Chat

© PremierLeagueChat.com

Are Foreign Player's To Blame For England Failure?


Title: Are Foreign Player's To Blame For England Failure?

...are they really?



November 21st 2007. Despite having an umbrella Steve McClaren is soaking wet. He doesn't manage to hide under it. Rain gets to him. Rain which has been coming down from his critics' pen's throughout his entire international career, and which will most certainly get stronger once he leaves the holly turf of Wembley stadium and steps into the tunnel. A tunnel which he's dragged their beloved England to. He knows that it was his last day as an England manager. England have failed. England senior football team won't be at the major International tournament for the first time since the 1994 World Cup in the United States.

After a few days of a so called hangover journalism, which included some good, constructive criticism but also some laughable suggestions (a letter to Blatter in which an author demands that England should be given a direct place in the World and European Cups), a thought how foreign players in EPL are to blame for England downfall, came up.

To make it clear what we're talking about we must determine what is branded as success or as a failure for one team. Success in football is a relative thing . For one it is the quarter finals, for others, nothing less than the final or only being a champion would do. But all in all, in football most of the times there is only one winner. Where is England in that story? Well they have managed to convince themselves and everyone else that they belong to the later group. Nothing less than a final. And if they fail to achieve it they start looking for excuses rather than the reasons. As I said, the later excuse that has come up is that influx of the foreign players is to blame for England underachieving. But how could that be? Were England champions in 2006, 2004 maybe? Or were they champions back in 1996 when the Championship was held at their soil? No.

Cristiano Ronaldo | Cesc Fabregas | Robinho | Fernando Torres

So what gives them the right to think they're the world class team? Some would say[i] “Well, the names like Gerrard, Lampard, Rooney, Terry, Ferdinand, J. Cole, A. Cole, Beckham etc.”[/i] If that's the case – how come foreign players have the influence on England national team then? Furthermore – not only that those players are brilliant players, but they are mostly the leading stars and main players in their teams. Sure foreign players have been bought more recently than in previous years, but it's not Vidic's fault that he cost about 7 million pounds and Rio Ferdinand about 30 million.

Take Brazil, Argentina, Germany or France for example. While the French league is struggling to keep up with the pace of other top 4 leagues their national team has been brilliant in the past decade. World Champions, European Champions, European semi finalists, World Cup finalists. We don't need to talk about Brazil's achievements and in Argentina's defence I will only say that they're the two times World champions and two times Olympic Champions. How about Germany? Where leading stars are foreign players and mostly foreign players which is not England's case? What's in common to these nations? The fact that they don't have such a strong league and that their young players seek their bread abroad. So saying that league strength reflects the strength of a national team is wrong. My Croatia proves that.

So the Premier League IS the strongest team in the world – true. The Premier League IS the strongest league in the world only because of foreign players – false. Even if it was true it wouldn't have any relevance with an English national team. If foreign players smother the young English talent, then why don't the English youngsters learn from the young Argentineans, Brazilians, Croats if you like and go to find their luck elsewhere in order to gain some experience before coming back to EPL? Maybe because they don't want to play for less money?

Now we've come to one of the real problems of England national team. England agents over rate their players, media can't wait for the same players to make a blunder to make them look like clowns and players haven't learned to deal with the pressure coming after making such mistakes - and that goes around the circle for quite some time now.

Foreign players don't come to England because they're better than homegrown players that much, they come because they're less expensive and with them or without them English Premier League is not the cause of England's constant failure, same as the Brazilian league is not the cause of Brazilian's success.

Written By: crooney

© PremierLeagueChat.com

The Perfect Foil For Fernando Torres?

Title: The Perfect Foil For Fernando Torres?

Rumours about Liverpool's interests in David Viila and his namesake Silva resurfaced recently, whilst Man City have been linked with a move for Villa. The availability of Villa and a host of other Valencia stars such as David Silva and Raul Albiol has become more prominent due to recent reports suggesting Valencia is in dire financial straits.

I have been a long time admirer of Villa and did cling on to the faintest hope that Liverpool might have signed him last summer. However, that always seemed improbable and Benitez eventually ruled out an immediate move for him, opting for Robbie Keane instead. Given that Keane was sold in January, I really do hope Rafa and the Liverpool board seriously reconsider moving for Villa, as having him and Torres up front is a salivating prospect. But the financial constraints that Hicks and Gillette place on Benitez for transfers make me doubt whether this would ever happen...

More often than not Benitez has had to sell players to generate funds before buying, and Liverpool's one and only £20m+ signing to date has been Torres. In the January transfer window Liverpool did not make a single signing and it was clear there wasn't much of a budget for Rafa to dabble in the market with in the first place. Meanwhile, Man Utd managed to sign Serbian duo Zoran Tosic and Adem Ljajic for a reported combined fee of around £16.3m. Moreover, I don't think the United board would hesitate if Fergie was to take up the option to sign Tevez permanently for around £30m.

The bottom line I think is that Hicks and Gillette should either cough up with the money or sell up. The fact that they are doing neither is extremely infuriating for us Liverpool fans. They have hinted at selling but to then quote to prospective buyers a price of £500m when the club still has outstanding debts that has yet to be refinanced just shows what the duo are all about. It was hardly surprisng when I read that talks with the interested buyers hit stumbling block after stumbling block, I mean to describe the quoted price of £500m as over the top would be a massive understatement.

Finally, there are some who suggested that Torres and Villa do not play well together based on their performances during Euro 2008. I personally don't buy that whatsoever. Torres and Villa are the first names on the team sheet playing upfront for the #1 ranked team in the world. They might not work as well together as some might expect but they are still a formidable partnership. Afterall, they won Euro 2008 playing together and they continue to do so for Spain. Furthermore, it was clear to see during Euro 2008 that Torres and Villa relate very well with each other, which is a big plus point in my opinion. If, and it's a big if, Rafa is backed to move for Villa then I believe we have a very good chance of signing him over other teams, as I expect Rafa and the Spanish contingent at Liverpool would prove to be a huge temptation for him to join the Reds.

Written By: turan

© PremierLeagueChat.com

Sunday, March 8, 2009

Is Jose Mourinho a really bad choice for United?

Title: Is Jose Mourinho a really bad choice for United?

Now love him or hate him but we all know that it's not easy to find Fergie's successor like for like...
At Man United they may have to settle for the next best thing and take into consideration any option possible including Jose Mourinho - that's right The Special One himself!
There aren't any managers whose goal is to entertain and win trophies at the same time . We know for a fact that Wenger is trying to cope with it but he hasn't had much success lately and he's been getting a lot of stick for it to be honest - and he's one of the best in the business

I actually think Chelsea with Robben and Duff were a joy to watch - their counter attacks were for the manuals - I think what Mourinho has tried and still trying to do with inter is to copy THAT Chelsea with Muntari trying to act Essien/Makelele , and Quaresma (while he was there) and Mancini trying to act Duff and Robben -with Zlatan being Drogba and Adriano trying to be something in between Drogba and Crespo - a mix of a skillful powerhouse (Drogba) and an eventual important goals scorer (Crespo)

I think with these players that United currently have , they couldn't play bad and that he should be given a chance in some point of his career
Apart from him I see only Del Bosque (his Real team played great and the fact is that they fell apart when he left) Hitzfield (won about everything ), Lippi, - but their main problem is that they're coming near the end of their careers. So would it be rather pointless in appointing a manager who's going to stick around for a few years only ?

Other than them I can remember only one young coach whose team has dominated with their attacking performances and he's actually won some trophies and played in the Champions League quite a few times - his name is Thommas Schaff - a manager of Werder Bremen - the way he snatched the title from Bayern (not sure if it was a double) with great attacking performances with a mediocre team is for an applause really

But sure King Eric would have to say something about it eh ?

Written By: crooney

© PremierLeagueChat.com

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

What a day...

Title: What a day...

So how did it go? In a nutshell, it was awesome. The day had it all. A first visit in 20 years, a six year old lads first ever visit, a win and a pantomime villain.

Having not been in so long I was really excited before the game. Even with it being changed to a 12.30 kick off on a sunday and travel chaos for thousands there was still a virtual full house. Despite there being nearly 15, 000 more people than when I last went the place did seem smaller than I remember, but then I was a 15 year old lad crammed into the old north bank last time.

The game itself was fairly even I thought and either side could have won, except City had £50m worth of miss-firing talent and the mighty Hammers had the latest academy star to rely on. Robinho was nothing short of woeful and Bellamy was just as ineffective. Up step 20 year old Jack Collison to show them how to do it and the crowd goes wild. Bellamy had already departed at this point and had done so in the most cowardly way. He sauntered over to the bench and then had a chat with his manager before running off down the tunnel before anyone realised what was happening. He had been targeted for some abuse through the game but it could have been a hell of a lot worse.

Parker was immense and accounted for Richards, Bellamy and Robinho apparently, great days work fella.

Credit to the city fans as well. They were very vocal and really got behind their team. They were also more than happy to get involved in the banter.

The sour note of the day was the injury to Valon. Looks serious and according to today's paper he's out for the rest of the season. He will be a big miss for us but, one persons misfortune is another's opportunity. Savio looked good when he came on and may now get a run in the side. He'll need to adjust quickly but early signs are promising.

As for me, well my passion is renewed and I'm already planning my next game. Looking to do an away day and can't wait. Youth football is going to have to wait for one more angry parent and refereeing will have to deal with the disappointment that I will not be joining their ranks :P.

What a day! Come On You Irons ;D ;D ;D

Written By: 13hammers

© PremierLeagueChat.com